Tag Archives: trace fossils

Ediacara; Welcome to the revolutionary world of animals

Facebooktwitterlinkedininstagram

Mistaken Point on the Atlantic coast of Newfoundland (Canada) acquired its unfortunate reputation by fooling mariners.  In a celebration of a different kind, UNESCO, in July 2016 designated the Mistaken Point coast a World Heritage Site; it is the graveyard of exquisitely preserved animals known as the Ediacaran Fauna, and at 575 million years they are the oldest known, structurally complex, multicellular creatures.

From an evolutionary context, life forms during the previous 3 billion years were dominated by much simpler algal-bacteria like organisms that constructed mats, mounds and columns (stromatolites) and even reef-like structures, all made by single-cell prokaryotes.  The Ediacaran fauna thus represents a kind of evolutionary paradigm shift – to real animals.  As Guy Narbonne (Queens University, Ontario) has suggested, this unique fauna probably formed the “root stock” of the more recent and familiar animal kingdom, but also includes some fossils that represent failed evolutionary experiments – creatures having unique form, phylum, and genetic codes that simply didn’t go anywhere.

The complete 2016 Mistaken Point UNESCO Heritage Site dossier by Richard Thomas and Guy Narbonne can be found here, but NB, it is a large file!

What kind of animals were they?

Although discovered in Namibia, the age and evolutionary significance of the fauna were first recognised in Flinders Range strata, Australia. The name Ediacara is probably Aboriginal.  Ediacaran fossils range from 575-542 million years; the period immediately prior to what is commonly called the Cambrian Explosion. Ediacaran fossils are now found on all continents except Antarctica.

The iconic Ediacaran fossils are those that appear petal-, feather-, or sea-pen-like, creatures that in some beautifully preserved examples exhibit complex growth patterns. Guy Narbonne has described these growth patterns as “quilted fractals”, an analogy that is quite apt. They were soft-bodied animals; fossils with hard parts, shells or hard skeletal frames did not appear until  the very end of the Precambrian, becoming abundant in the Cambrian.  The petal-like structures had a central stem that was attached to or grew into the sea floor; in some cases only these holdfasts are preserved. Other forms that appear frond-like grew to almost 2m in length. Some were fan-, bush-, and comb-shaped; others simple domes or discs. Imagine the ancient seafloor covered in a forest of these soft, delicate forms, swaying in the wash of gentle sea currents.  It must have been quite stunning.

Trace fossils are also present, becoming abundant in rocks younger than about 555 million years.  These are not static impressions of animals, but tracks and burrows of worm-like creatures that moved on or through soft sediment.  Many traces resemble those made by animals in much younger strata, and if the same interpretation is applied to the Ediacaran types, then they too represent animal behaviours such as feeding, or burrowing a new home.

 

Preservation – an interesting conundrum

Paleontologists frequently consider the preservation potential of the fauna and flora they study.  Animals having hard parts are more likely to be preserved than those without.  However, even skeletal remains may not survive the vagaries of scavenging or dislocation.  Complete dinosaur skeletons, although celebrated, are rare; after death the animal is prone to being eaten, crunched by powerful jaws, or dismembered by flooding rivers. Preservation of soft-bodied animals is even more fraught – they tend to decay rapidly, are eaten by scavengers, or are dismembered by ocean currents and waves.

Most Ediacaran fossils were preserved as impressions in sediment. The uniqueness of the Ediacaran fossil record is a testimony to the absence of scavengers during this geological period.  Many, like the Mistaken Point communities (and also in Mackenzie Mountains) lived in relatively deep water where currents were subdued but strong enough to ensure a continuous supply of nutrients.  That the fossils are intact means that they were buried by sediment before decay set in.

Those animal communities that lived in shallower seas (there are examples in Australia, Namibia and Russia) were periodically subjected to stronger currents and waves and had correspondingly lower preservation potential.  The buried parts of stems and fronds, and some animal burrows could be preserved (after all they were already buried), but the more delicate structures above the sea floor were easily broken up.   In some environments, such as those now found in the Flinders Range, the dead fronds or bushes were covered by a thin microbial mat that enhanced preservation.  Elsewhere (Newfoundland and England), volcanic ash falling into the sea filtered quickly through the water column, gently smothering the live animals – a bit like Pompeii.

In the grand scheme of things It is generally understood that complex, multicellular animals like the Ediacara fauna require oxygen.  For much of the preceding 3 billion years, free oxygen was in short supply. By about 1800 million years the oxygen levels are thought to have been about 10% of the concentration in our modern atmosphere (based mainly on stable isotope chemistry).  The biomass back then was dominated by single cell, prokaryotic microbes (such as cyanobacteria).  There is good evidence that simple, multicell eukaryotes were present at least 1300 million years ago, for example in forms like red algae, but they were in the minority. Sudden appearance of the Ediacaran fauna indicates that oxygen levels may have increased abruptly 600-580 million years ago, creating the right conditions for evolutionary expansion; some estimates put oxygen concentrations at about 50% present atmospheric levels.

Continued research will probably refine these numbers. Regardless, the Ediacaran fauna provides fantastic evidence of significant evolutionary trajectories and ancient environmental conditions for one of the most crucial periods in the history of our earth.

Addendum: Although many who study these fossils do consider them to be the most ancient’animals’, others disagree; suggestions such as fungi, large protists, or some kind of lichen (the latter does seem unlikely). The form Dickinsonia (shown above) has come into its own once again where, in a recent study, fossil biomarkers were discovered in samples taken near the White Sea, Russia. Identification of fossil steroid markers confirms a direct link to the animal kingdom (Science, Sept 21, 2018). It seems likely that many other Ediacaran fossils were also the very first true animals, precursors to the myriad forms that appeared during the Cambrian explosion.

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedin
Facebooktwitterlinkedininstagram

Someone passed this way: Tracks, trails, impressions, and footprints

Facebooktwitterlinkedininstagram

How Geologists Interpret Ancient Environments. 4 Trace Fossils

Imagine the squelch!

biped tracks

Footprints of people, birds, and dogs at the beach. Most of us have probably seen this kind of thing. Look a little closer and you will see other markings in the sand or mud – skinny trails meandering across the surface, or burrows. birds feet

Sometimes you will see the critter that made these. We can also observe structures like these preserved in many kinds of sedimentary rock; we call them Trace Fossils. The study of trace fossils is also called Ichnology (a branch of Paleontology), but we’ll stick to the more intuitive name trace fossil.  Continue reading

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedin
Facebooktwitterlinkedininstagram

How do we know which way is up? #1. Getting started

Facebooktwitterlinkedininstagram

How Geologists Interpret Ancient Environments. 1 Getting started

You are confronted with rock formations that might look something like this…

South Bay

The local geologist tells you that the rocks you see here originally were deposited as sands and muds in shallow seas, where beaches and broad coastal tidal flats passed seawards to deeper waters, and landwards to marshes and scrubby coastal plains across which rivers and streams coursed. How did our geologist figure this out? What is it that geologists see in the rocks that help them paint this picture of an idyllic world that existed so many millions of years ago – a world beyond memory, where, in a different eon, a summer cottage would have been rather nice. Continue reading

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedin
Facebooktwitterlinkedininstagram